< RESOURCES / >

Fintech

A Consultant's Guide to Penetration Testing as a Service

A Consultant's Guide to Penetration Testing as a Service

Penetration Testing as a Service (PTaaS) is more than a streamlined security audit; it's a fundamental shift in how modern businesses manage risk. This approach moves security from a periodic, high-friction event to a continuous process integrated directly into your software development lifecycle. The result is real-time feedback, predictable costs, and a clear line of sight between security investments and business outcomes.

Why PTaaS Is Reshaping Modern Security Strategy

Let's move beyond the textbook definitions. A traditional penetration test is like an annual vehicle inspection—it confirms your security posture was sound on one specific day. While useful, it's a static snapshot that becomes outdated the moment your team deploys a new feature.

Cybersecurity professional monitoring continuous security testing on multiple screens with code displayed

Penetration Testing as a Service (PTaaS), in contrast, is like having live diagnostics plugged into your engine 24/7. It provides constant validation, enabling you to identify and remediate vulnerabilities as they emerge, not just once a year. For any organization focused on rapid innovation, this agile model is essential for managing risk without sacrificing speed.

Connecting Security to Business Outcomes

By integrating security testing directly into your development pipeline, PTaaS delivers tangible business value. Security ceases to be a bottleneck before a major launch and instead becomes an enabler of confident, accelerated delivery. A last-minute, showstopper vulnerability can delay a release, damage customer trust, and drive up remediation costs.

PTaaS helps mitigate these risks by:

  • Accelerating Time-to-Market: By finding and fixing flaws early in the development process ("shifting left"), security becomes an integrated part of the workflow, not a final gatekeeper.
  • Ensuring Predictable Costs: A subscription model eliminates expensive, one-off project fees. More importantly, finding bugs early is significantly cheaper than patching them in a live production environment.
  • Reducing Organizational Risk: Continuous testing ensures your security posture keeps pace with code changes, minimizing the window of opportunity for attackers and protecting revenue streams.
  • Simplifying Compliance: The model provides the ongoing evidence required for regulations like PSD2 or SOC 2, making audits smoother and less resource-intensive.

In short, PTaaS aligns security objectives with business velocity. It ensures that as you build and ship faster, your security capabilities scale accordingly, protecting revenue and reputation without impeding momentum.

A Practical Shift for Development Teams

This model fundamentally changes the dynamic for development teams and their managers. Consider Managed Service Providers, who manage complex infrastructures for multiple clients. For them, a continuous security model is a necessity, not a luxury. This guide on PTaaS for MSPs provides a deeper look into this specific use case.

Ultimately, PTaaS transforms security from an external audit into a collaborative, data-driven function. It equips developers with the insights needed to write more secure code from the outset. This proactive approach builds resilience directly into your engineering culture, ensuring your security is as dynamic as your business.

So, Which PTaaS Model is Right for You?

Selecting the right Penetration Testing as a Service model is a strategic business decision, not just a technical one. Your choice directly impacts your team's velocity, budget, and risk management effectiveness. It comes down to aligning the testing cadence and integration level with your specific business needs. Are you seeking constant validation for an application that changes daily, or a deep-dive assessment for a specific launch?

An incorrect choice can lead to paying for continuous coverage you don't use or, worse, running infrequent tests that leave significant security gaps between releases. Understanding the core models helps align your security testing with key business drivers: reducing remediation costs and accelerating time-to-market.

Continuous PTaaS: For Teams That Never Stop Shipping

The Continuous PTaaS model is designed for the pace of modern software development, where teams deploy code multiple times a day. It functions less like a one-off audit and more like an ongoing dialogue between your developers and the testing platform. Instead of a single, large-scale test, this model integrates smaller, ongoing security tests directly into your CI/CD pipeline.

This model is ideal for organizations with a mature DevOps culture. The primary value lies in early detection, which generates significant cost savings. Identifying and fixing a vulnerability within a two-week sprint is exponentially cheaper and faster than discovering a critical flaw the day before a major product launch.

A continuous model delivers key business advantages:

  • Slash Remediation Costs: When vulnerabilities are found moments after new code is committed, developers can address them while the context is fresh, drastically lowering the cost-per-fix.
  • Get to Market Faster: Security is no longer the final gatekeeper before a release. It becomes a predictable, integrated part of the workflow, eliminating last-minute fire drills that delay launch schedules and impact revenue.
  • Improve Developer Capabilities: Constant, immediate feedback on security issues is a powerful training tool. Over time, developers naturally begin writing more secure code, embedding security ownership across the team.

On-Demand PTaaS: For Targeted, High-Stakes Assessments

Conversely, the On-Demand PTaaS model is analogous to engaging a specialist for a targeted consultation. It is perfectly suited for project-based needs where the stakes are high, such as a major feature release, a complex third-party integration, or preparation for a compliance audit like PCI DSS or SOC 2. You initiate a full-scope penetration test precisely when you need it.

This approach provides flexibility and is well-suited for businesses that do not operate on a continuous deployment schedule. It allows you to focus intensive security resources on a specific asset at a critical moment, ensuring it is thoroughly hardened before going live or facing an auditor.

The trade-off is clear: Continuous PTaaS integrates security into daily operations for ongoing risk reduction. On-Demand PTaaS delivers deep, targeted assurance for specific business milestones.

The Hybrid Model: Blending Bots and Brains

A third, increasingly popular approach is the Hybrid PTaaS model. It's built on the principle that neither pure automation nor pure manual testing is sufficient alone. This model combines the relentless speed of automated scanning with the creative, critical thinking of an expert human tester.

Automated tools run continuously, identifying common vulnerabilities like those in the OWASP Top 10. This establishes a strong security baseline. Then, human experts are engaged on-demand to hunt for complex vulnerabilities that scanners consistently miss, such as business logic flaws or chained exploits. This blended model provides the best of both worlds: efficient, broad coverage from automation and high-impact, nuanced testing from human experts, all while optimizing your security budget.


To clarify the differences, let's break them down in a table.

Comparing Traditional Pentesting vs PTaaS Models

This table outlines the key operational and business differences between traditional pentesting and the primary PTaaS models, highlighting where each approach excels.

FeatureTraditional PentestingContinuous PTaaSOn-Demand PTaaS
Testing CadencePoint-in-time (e.g., annually)Ongoing, integrated into the SDLC/CI/CD pipelineProject-based, scheduled as needed
Remediation ProcessA large report delivered at the end of the engagementReal-time findings delivered to developers via ticketsA final report delivered after the test concludes
Ideal ForAnnual compliance checks, legacy applicationsAgile/DevOps environments, rapidly evolving productsMajor releases, M&A due diligence, compliance audits
Cost StructureHigh upfront project feeSubscription-based (monthly/annually)Project-based fee per engagement
IntegrationManual, siloed from developmentDeeply integrated with tools like Jira, Slack, CI/CDLimited integration, focused on reporting
Time-to-ValueSlow; weeks from engagement to final reportFast; vulnerabilities found and reported within hoursModerate; days to a few weeks for a full report
CoverageA snapshot of risk at a single point in timeContinuous visibility into risk as the code changesA deep-dive snapshot for a specific scope and time

As the table shows, the move to "as-a-service" models is about shifting security from a standalone event to a continuous, integrated business function. The choice between Continuous and On-Demand is a matter of aligning that function with your development rhythm and business objectives.

How to Weave PTaaS Into Your DevOps Pipeline

Integrating Penetration Testing as a Service into your development workflow is a strategic move, not just a tool addition. It transforms security from a late-stage bottleneck into a competitive advantage that supports faster, more secure product delivery.

By embedding security checks directly into your CI/CD pipeline, you operationalize the "shift left" principle—catching vulnerabilities early when they are least expensive and easiest to fix. This makes security a natural, low-friction component of your software development process.

The objective is to move from a reactive to a proactive security posture. This eliminates last-minute findings that derail release schedules and instead provides continuous validation that keeps pace with development. This approach not only reduces costly post-production fixes but also builds security awareness across the entire engineering organization.

Pinpointing the Right Moments for Security Checks

A successful PTaaS integration involves automating security tests at critical points in your development cycle. By connecting your PTaaS platform to existing tools like Jenkins, GitLab, or GitHub Actions via APIs, you can trigger specific security scans automatically based on developer actions.

Key trigger points include:

  • On Code Commit: Trigger lightweight, automated scans on every commit to a feature branch. This provides immediate feedback on common errors while the code is still fresh in the developer's mind.
  • On Pull Request: Use a pull request as a quality gate to run more thorough automated scans, preventing vulnerable code from being merged into the main branch.
  • Before Staging Deployment: Initiate a comprehensive, automated test suite against the application before it is deployed to the staging environment. This validates the security of newly integrated features working together.
  • Pre-Release: For major releases or high-risk features, schedule targeted, human-led penetration tests. This combines the speed of automation with expert analysis to find complex business logic flaws.

This diagram illustrates how different PTaaS models map to the development lifecycle, from traditional scheduled tests to the fluid, continuous testing required by modern DevOps.

PTaaS Flow diagram showing three service delivery models: Traditional, Continuous, and On-Demand penetration testing

This visualizes the evolution from point-in-time assessments to the continuous feedback loop that defines an integrated security culture.

From Findings to Fixes: Closing the Loop

The true value of an integrated penetration testing as a service model lies in its ability to connect a finding directly to a fix. Modern PTaaS platforms bypass static PDF reports, instead pushing findings directly into the tools your developers use daily.

By integrating with systems like Jira, Slack, or Azure DevOps, PTaaS transforms a security finding into an actionable developer ticket. The ticket arrives in the correct team's backlog, pre-populated with technical details, reproduction steps, and clear remediation guidance.

This streamlined workflow eliminates the friction and communication overhead typical of traditional security handoffs. Security becomes a transparent, collaborative part of the sprint, not a separate, external function. To optimize this process, it's crucial to incorporate actionable DevOps security best practices throughout your entire workflow.

Scaling Your Security Brainpower

Integrating PTaaS is also about scaling security expertise. Hiring and retaining enough senior security talent to keep pace with a high-velocity development team is a significant challenge. Augmenting your in-house team is a practical solution.

Partnering with external experts who can manage the PTaaS integration and help triage complex findings ensures your security doesn't become a bottleneck. For teams needing to move even faster, flexible team augmentation can provide the specific skills required to secure your pipeline without slowing down development.

Ultimately, weaving PTaaS into your DevOps pipeline creates a powerful feedback loop that reduces risk, controls costs, and empowers your teams to build innovative products securely and at speed.

Making Sense of PTaaS Reports and Dashboards

Effective security programs run on clear, actionable intelligence, not on 100-page PDF reports that are obsolete upon arrival. Modern penetration testing as a service platforms have moved beyond static documents to provide live dashboards offering a real-time, transparent view of your security posture. This is a critical shift for making informed risk decisions and demonstrating the ROI of your security investments.

Tablet displaying colorful analytics dashboard with actionable insights on desk with notebook and coffee

The purpose of a PTaaS dashboard is to translate raw vulnerability data into a clear narrative about business risk. Instead of presenting a simple list of issues, it should immediately highlight critical threats and guide your team's focus. This clarity is what distinguishes a useful security tool from a simple data repository.

Beyond Static PDFs to Dynamic Dashboards

The traditional pentesting process culminated in a large PDF—a static, historical document. This created significant operational friction, requiring security teams to manually parse findings, create tickets in Jira, and track remediation in spreadsheets.

A modern PTaaS platform eliminates this entire inefficient process with a single, interactive dashboard. This is more than an incremental improvement; it provides significant business advantages:

  • Reduced Time-to-Remediation: Vulnerabilities appear on the dashboard as soon as they are validated, allowing developers to begin remediation immediately and dramatically shrink the window of exposure.
  • A Single Source of Truth: The dashboard aligns security, development, and management teams around the same live data, eliminating confusion from disparate email chains and outdated reports.
  • Live Security Posture Visibility: You gain a continuous, real-time view of your risk profile, which is essential for managing fast-paced development cycles and demonstrating compliance to auditors.

A PTaaS dashboard functions less like a report and more like an operational hub. It is the connective tissue between finding a problem and shipping a fix, collapsing the remediation cycle from weeks to hours.

Interpreting Key Metrics and Visualisations

A well-designed dashboard provides tailored insights for different stakeholders. For a CTO or Head of Engineering, this means moving beyond a simple count of "high," "medium," and "low" vulnerabilities to metrics that provide business context.

Look for dashboards that enable you to:

  • Prioritize by Business Risk, Not Just Severity: A "critical" vulnerability on an internal staging server is less concerning than a "medium" one on your primary payment API. Effective dashboards help you contextualize this by combining technical severity (like a CVSS score) with business impact to generate a true risk rating.
  • Track Remediation Velocity: Metrics like Mean Time to Remediate (MTTR) are invaluable. They measure how quickly your team is addressing security debt. Tracking this trend over time indicates whether your processes are improving or hitting a bottleneck.
  • Segment and Filter Findings: You should be able to instantly filter vulnerabilities by application, environment (production vs. staging), or a specific compliance framework like PCI DSS. This reduces the time required to prepare for an audit or a team meeting from hours to minutes.

Making Security Actionable for Developers

This is where the platform's value is truly realized. A key benefit of a good PTaaS dashboard is how it empowers developers by providing everything needed to resolve an issue without prolonged back-and-forth communication.

A high-quality finding within a dashboard should include:

  • Clear Reproduction Steps: Unambiguous, step-by-step instructions—sometimes including a video—demonstrating exactly how the vulnerability is exploited.
  • Code Snippets and Fix Suggestions: Concrete examples of how to patch the code, tailored to your team's specific language and framework.
  • One-Click Ticketing: The ability to push a vulnerability directly into a Jira or Azure DevOps ticket, pre-populated with all necessary technical details.

This focus on the developer experience is not a minor feature; it is what drives the business outcome. It reduces context-switching for engineers, allowing them to focus on building features. This accelerates the entire remediation cycle, ultimately making your security program more cost-effective.

This trend is gaining momentum globally, including in markets like Hungary. The local penetration testing market in Hungary is expanding rapidly, driven by increased cyber threats and stringent regulations like GDPR and the Hungarian Cybersecurity Act. The Act now mandates vulnerability testing at least every two years for critical sectors, making continuous platforms more relevant than ever.

In the end, PTaaS dashboards and reports are designed to close the gap between finding a flaw and fixing it, making your entire organization more resilient.

How to Choose the Right PTaaS Vendor

Selecting a penetration testing as a service partner is a critical decision that extends beyond comparing feature checklists. The right vendor acts as an extension of your security team, enabling you to ship products faster while reducing risk. The wrong one generates noise, overwhelming developers with low-value alerts and creating friction.

To make an informed choice, you must look past marketing claims and evaluate their methodology, integration capabilities, and the quality of their human experts. The goal is to find a partner whose process aligns with your business objectives, whether that's meeting a product deadline or navigating complex compliance requirements.

Balancing Automation with Human Expertise

A primary evaluation point is the vendor's blend of automated scanning and expert-led manual testing. Automated tools are effective for identifying known vulnerabilities and establishing a baseline of security coverage. However, they consistently miss complex business logic flaws—the types of vulnerabilities that can lead to significant financial or reputational damage.

Therefore, it is essential to ask direct questions:

  • What is your ratio of manual vs. automated testing? A strong partner uses automation for broad coverage and then deploys human experts to hunt for nuanced, context-specific vulnerabilities.
  • What is the expertise of your testing team? Look for teams with respected certifications (e.g., OSCP), but more importantly, seek proven experience in your specific industry, such as fintech or healthcare.
  • How do you identify business logic flaws? Ask for specific examples. How would they test a unique user permission model or a complex payment workflow in your application?

A hybrid approach is non-negotiable. It provides the efficiency of automation without sacrificing the deep, creative analysis that only a seasoned human tester can provide.

Scrutinising SLAs and Integration Capabilities

The value of a PTaaS platform is fully realized when it integrates seamlessly into your existing workflows. A vendor that simply emails a PDF report is creating administrative work, not solving a problem.

Your chosen vendor should function as a force multiplier for your team, not just a ticket generator. Their platform must accelerate remediation by delivering clear, actionable findings directly into developer backlogs.

When vetting a vendor, confirm their platform can genuinely integrate with your core systems:

  1. CI/CD Pipeline Integration: Can it automatically initiate scans upon a code commit or before a build deployment? This is crucial for embedding security into your DevOps cycle using tools like Jenkins, GitLab CI, or GitHub Actions.
  2. Ticketing System Integration: Does it create detailed, ready-to-work tickets in Jira, Azure DevOps, or your chosen system? These tickets must include clear reproduction steps, code examples, and robust remediation guidance.
  3. Communication and Alerting: Can it push critical alerts directly to Slack or Microsoft Teams to ensure immediate visibility for the right stakeholders?

Beyond integrations, closely examine their Service Level Agreements (SLAs). Request firm commitments on their timelines for identifying and reporting critical vulnerabilities following a new release. A strong SLA is a key indicator of a mature and confident penetration testing as a service provider.

This need for expert-led testing is particularly acute in regulated industries. In Hungary, for example, sophisticated cyberattacks are driving demand for precise pentesting that meets both GDPR and NIS2 requirements. One report projects the professional cybersecurity services market in Hungary to reach US$82.78 million by 2025, largely due to the need to manage business risk and meet stringent compliance mandates.

Finding the right vendor requires evaluating both their technology and their business alignment. It is often beneficial to review a partner's proven expertise in secure software development to ensure they understand the entire lifecycle, from initial code to final compliance.

FAQ About Vendor Selection

Q1 What should I look for in a sample report?A strong report is written for a developer audience. It should be concise and provide unambiguous steps to reproduce the vulnerability. Look for remediation advice that is specific to your technology stack, not generic boilerplate text.

Q2 How important is industry-specific experience?It is critically important, especially in regulated sectors like fintech. A vendor with expertise in PSD2 or Open Banking will understand the specific threats and compliance pressures you face, making their testing far more relevant and valuable.

Q3 Can we start with a pilot project?Absolutely. A paid pilot or proof-of-concept is the most effective way to evaluate a vendor's platform, communication style, and the quality of their findings before committing to a long-term contract.

Transitioning from periodic, project-based security assessments to a continuous model is a strategic decision that directly impacts your risk profile, security spend, and product velocity.

The objective is to stop treating security as a quarterly blocker and instead integrate it into the fabric of how you build software. This is essential for accelerating time-to-market without increasing exposure.

This transition is a calculated process. Your first step is to build a clear business case by conducting a thorough internal assessment, not by scheduling sales calls.

Start with an Internal Needs Assessment

Before evaluating vendors, you must understand what you are protecting and why. This step grounds your strategy in real business risk, making it easier to justify the investment and measure its effectiveness.

Identify three key areas:

  • Your Crown Jewels: What are the most critical assets in your technology stack? This could be the API handling financial transactions, the database storing customer data, or the primary revenue-generating web application.
  • Your Risk Tolerance: Define what an acceptable level of risk looks like for these assets. Your public-facing marketing website has a different risk profile from a platform requiring PSD2 compliance. Be specific.
  • Your Development Velocity: How frequently do you ship code? A team deploying multiple times a day requires a continuous PTaaS model. A monthly release cycle might begin with on-demand tests.

Prepare for a Pilot Programme

Once your internal needs are clear, conduct a pilot program with one or two shortlisted vendors. A pilot is the best way to validate a vendor's claims in a real-world setting. It shifts the conversation from comparing features to evaluating how their platform actually works with your team.

For more information on building secure development practices, you can find valuable insights in our security resources section.

A successful pilot does more than just find vulnerabilities; it must demonstrate that the PTaaS solution makes your team faster at remediating them. The key metric is a measurable reduction in your Mean Time to Remediate (MTTR).

Adopting penetration testing as a service is about embedding security so deeply into your operations that it becomes second nature. Start by clarifying your risks, then validate your chosen solution with a focused pilot. This will provide a rock-solid business case that links security directly to core business objectives.

Ready to see how a PTaaS strategy could secure your product roadmap?

Book a consultation with our experts today.

Your PTaaS Questions, Answered

Adopting a new security model inevitably raises questions. When CTOs and product leaders consider penetration testing as a service, their primary concerns often revolve around the impact on budget, team resources, and project timelines. Here are answers to the most common inquiries.

How Does PTaaS Pricing Compare to a Traditional Pentest?

The fundamental difference is the shift from a large, infrequent capital expense to a predictable operational expense. A traditional pentest involves a significant one-time invoice for a point-in-time assessment, which can complicate budgeting and limit testing frequency.

PTaaS uses a subscription model, typically billed monthly or annually. This provides several key business advantages:

  • Predictable Budgeting: A fixed cost simplifies financial planning and eliminates budget surprises.
  • Improved Return on Investment: Continuous testing allows for early vulnerability detection. Fixing a bug pre-production is substantially cheaper than remediating it in a live environment.
  • Payment for Continuous Value: Your investment supports ongoing risk reduction and security posture improvement, not just a single, rapidly outdated PDF report.

While the total annual cost might appear similar at first, the value derived from continuous testing and reduced remediation costs makes PTaaS a more financially sound approach for any organization that regularly ships code.

Will PTaaS Replace Our In-House Security Team?

No, this is a common misconception. PTaaS does not replace your security experts; it augments them and enhances their effectiveness. It acts as a force multiplier by automating repetitive, time-consuming testing, allowing your team to focus on high-value strategic work.

PTaaS handles broad-based vulnerability scanning and provides a continuous stream of validated findings. This frees your in-house professionals to concentrate on more complex challenges:

  • In-Depth Threat Modeling: Analyzing unique business logic and architectural flaws that automated scanners cannot detect.
  • Strategic Security Architecture: Designing more resilient systems from the ground up rather than just patching vulnerabilities reactively.
  • Incident Response Planning: Developing and testing strategies for handling sophisticated, real-world cyberattacks.

By delegating tactical, day-to-day testing to a PTaaS provider, you elevate your internal team's role. They transition from being vulnerability hunters to strategic advisors focused on improving the organization's long-term security posture.

What’s the Onboarding Time Like for a PTaaS Platform?

Onboarding is a matter of days, not weeks or months. Modern PTaaS platforms are designed for rapid implementation and fast time-to-value, eliminating the lengthy scoping calls and manual setup processes associated with traditional engagements.

The process is typically straightforward:

  1. Initial Scoping (1-2 days): You identify the applications and environments to be tested.
  2. Platform Integration (1-3 days): The platform is connected to your existing toolchain. This usually involves linking to Jira for ticketing and Slack for alerts, often through pre-built connectors or simple APIs.
  3. Baseline Scan (2-5 days): An initial comprehensive scan is performed to establish a security baseline. Actionable findings begin populating your dashboard almost immediately.

From this point forward, the value is continuous. The first vulnerability reports are typically available within a week, allowing your development team to begin remediation promptly. This rapid time-to-value is a key advantage, enabling you to start reducing your attack surface from day one.


Your security needs to move as fast as your product does. A Penetration Testing as a Service model gives you the always-on assurance you need to ship features with confidence, without killing your momentum. At SCALER Software Solutions Ltd, we help companies build security right into their development lifecycle, making sure your innovations are solid from the start.

Ready to trade periodic audits for continuous security? Request a proposal and let's talk about your PTaaS strategy.

< MORE RESOURCES / >

A Practical Guide to the Proof of Concept in Fintech

Fintech

A Practical Guide to the Proof of Concept in Fintech

Read more
Java vs Kotlin: A Strategic Guide for Business & Tech Leaders

Fintech

Java vs Kotlin: A Strategic Guide for Business & Tech Leaders

Read more
PSD2 Integration for CTOs: Real-World Challenges and Architecture Insights

Fintech

PSD2 Integration for CTOs: Real-World Challenges and Architecture Insights

Read more
Implementing Payment Integration in Fintech: Challenges and Architectural Insights

Fintech

Implementing Payment Integration in Fintech: Challenges and Architectural Insights

Read more
A Guide to Team Augmentation with Client-Led Projects

Team augmentation

A Guide to Team Augmentation with Client-Led Projects

Read more
Hiring vs. Outsourcing: Finding the Right Balance with Team Augmentation

Team augmentation

Hiring vs. Outsourcing: Finding the Right Balance with Team Augmentation

Read more
By clicking "Allow all" you consent to the storage of cookies on your device for the purpose of improving site navigation, and analyzing site usage. See our Privacy Policy for more.
Deny all
Allow all